We know that CPX-351 has a great efficacy in secondary AML. Following the results of Phase III trials by Lancet, we know that it is more effective than conventional chemotherapy. We know that this is at least when we define secondary AML according to the previous WHO classification of 2016, which was the classification that was used in the Phase III trial. We still do not know if we apply the newer WHO classification, which implies a genetic-driven classification of secondary AML, if this still holds true...
We know that CPX-351 has a great efficacy in secondary AML. Following the results of Phase III trials by Lancet, we know that it is more effective than conventional chemotherapy. We know that this is at least when we define secondary AML according to the previous WHO classification of 2016, which was the classification that was used in the Phase III trial. We still do not know if we apply the newer WHO classification, which implies a genetic-driven classification of secondary AML, if this still holds true. So in our experience, we tried to reclassify secondary AML according to the new classification, and we saw that CPX351 is effective even in the secondary AML defined molecularly. This is in line with the British trial results when patients who had myelodysplasia-related gene aberration did better with CPX than conventional chemo. So that’s relevant information.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.