Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Lymphoma Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from AstraZeneca (Diamond), BMS (Gold), Johnson & Johnson (Gold), Takeda (Silver) and Galapagos (Bronze). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

ICML 2025 | Updates from the BRAWM trial: bendamustine, rituximab and acalabrutinib in patients with WM

Neil Berinstein, MD, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada, shares the promising results of the BRAWM trial (NCT04624906), which is evaluating the combination of bendamustine, rituximab, and acalabrutinib in patients with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM). This combination has demonstrated response rates of over 60%, high rates of measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity, and may offer a promising approach for patients with higher-risk disease. This interview took place during the 18th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (18-ICML) in Lugano, Switzerland.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript

We’re very pleased with the results of the BRAWM trial. That’s what we’re presenting at the ICML in Lugano currently and the results are very positive. We see the highest response rates ever seen in Waldenström’s for first-line treatments. The complete and very good partial response rate is over 60% and historically the rates have been closer to 20-25% so we’ve actually doubled the complete and very good partial response rate...

We’re very pleased with the results of the BRAWM trial. That’s what we’re presenting at the ICML in Lugano currently and the results are very positive. We see the highest response rates ever seen in Waldenström’s for first-line treatments. The complete and very good partial response rate is over 60% and historically the rates have been closer to 20-25% so we’ve actually doubled the complete and very good partial response rate. We see that we’re getting deep responses because complete and very good partial responses are by definition almost very complete responses and we’re also backing this up with very high rates of minimal residual disease negative results in patients’ peripheral blood, not so much in the bone marrow but definitely in the peripheral blood. The MRD negative rates at our first response assessment were very close to 70% to 80%. Now, I think that these results are important. We’ll have to see how it plays out and whether these very deep initial responses translate into longer durations of response. But one thing we’re very excited about, and we’ve looked at this very carefully, is that patients who have very high-risk Waldenström’s, so patients who have mutations of CXCR4 or who have wild-type MYD88, these patients are known to have poor response rates to standard treatments and shorter response durations. These patients behave very similarly to all other patients in our trial. They had the same response rate; there was no different response rate or MRD rate that we were able to document in these high-risk subgroups. So it could be that patients with higher-risk Waldenström’s would be ideal candidates for this type of combination treatment where we combine several different treatments together.

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...