So now that we will have the combination of Glofitamab and GemOx becoming available with registration internationally in many jurisdictions, the question is how do we best sequence whether it is in the second line. In this study it was both the second line and third line plus and the benefit of the risk of the investigational product Glofitamab was demonstrated in both subgroups...
So now that we will have the combination of Glofitamab and GemOx becoming available with registration internationally in many jurisdictions, the question is how do we best sequence whether it is in the second line. In this study it was both the second line and third line plus and the benefit of the risk of the investigational product Glofitamab was demonstrated in both subgroups. Realistically now we’ll be approaching patients with subsequent therapies according to which line they’re having it. For instance if they’ve already seen R-CHOP or Polatuzumab-containing R-CHP in the front line, if they’re seeing CAR-T in the second line if they progress within 12 months, that’s where Glofitamab-GemOx won’t come in until the third line and therefore patients will already have been through CAR-T and bispecifics and we’re left with a smaller pool of investigational therapies or directed therapies to go for. So what therapies we follow in with after Glofitamab-GemOx will largely be defined by prior therapies and the patient’s performance status.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.