This work starts from the observation in the British trial where CPX was compared to fludarabine, idarubicin and cytarabine for high-risk AML, not only secondary AML but all high-risk AML including some secondary AML patients. In the secondary AML subset there was a strong benefit for CPX351 over fludarabine-based approach. But there was not enough data to understand why there was such a benefit...
This work starts from the observation in the British trial where CPX was compared to fludarabine, idarubicin and cytarabine for high-risk AML, not only secondary AML but all high-risk AML including some secondary AML patients. In the secondary AML subset there was a strong benefit for CPX351 over fludarabine-based approach. But there was not enough data to understand why there was such a benefit. We compared in our institution patients who received CPX or fludarabine-based regimen for secondary AML and we observed that most of the benefit comes from an increased MRD clearance probability in patients who received CPX. So CPX leads to more profound response with higher probability of MRD negativity. This alongside with reduced toxicity allows more patients to proceed to allogenic stem cell transplantation in MRD negative complete remission status and in a good clinical shape. And this leads to the observed better survival with CPX.
This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.