Educational content on VJHemOnc is intended for healthcare professionals only. By visiting this website and accessing this information you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

The Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Channel on VJHemOnc is an independent medical education platform, supported with funding from Takeda (Gold) and Kartos Therapeutics, Inc. (Bronze). Supporters have no influence on the production of content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.

Share this video  

ASH 2024 | Initial results of the SANRECO trial evaluating divesiran in patients with polycythemia vera

Marina Kremyanskaya, MD, PhD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, shares the initial results from the SANRECO trial (NCT05499013), a Phase I/II study evaluating divesiran, a novel GalNAc-conjugated small interfering RNA (siRNA), in patients with polycythemia vera (PV). Dr Kremyanskaya explains that divesiran increases endogenous hepcidin production, reducing iron availability for erythropoiesis and, in turn, decreasing red blood cell production. So far, the study has shown a significant reduction in the number of phlebotomies needed by patients, along with a favorable safety profile. This interview took place at the 66th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, held in San Diego, CA.

These works are owned by Magdalen Medical Publishing (MMP) and are protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world. All rights are reserved.

Transcript (AI-generated)

The SANRECO trial was a first trial in polycythemia vera using something called small interfering RNA. And it’s basically used to knock down the negative regulator of hepcidin production. So the point is to increase endogenous hepcidin production. And by increasing hepcidin, we restrict the amount of iron that is available for erythropoiesis in the bone marrow, which results in decreased red blood cell production...

The SANRECO trial was a first trial in polycythemia vera using something called small interfering RNA. And it’s basically used to knock down the negative regulator of hepcidin production. So the point is to increase endogenous hepcidin production. And by increasing hepcidin, we restrict the amount of iron that is available for erythropoiesis in the bone marrow, which results in decreased red blood cell production. Previous study with the drug called rusfertide has shown that by increasing hepcidin, in that case using the hepcidin mimetic rusfertide, you can control hematocrit in patients with PV and they no longer need phlebotomies or at least need much less phlebotomies and therefore control their disease, potentially also improve their symptoms. So this is a different approach to endogenously increase hepcidin. 

And these were results from a Phase I studies, so early results. And it showed that this approach seemed to work. These patients were enrolled in different dosing cohorts, but for all dosing cohorts, the number of phlebotomies that the patient needed went down significantly, and especially for those patients that had hematocrits that were well controlled at baseline, they really didn’t need any more phlebotomies. Importantly for Phase I study, the drug was very well tolerated. The most significant side effect was injection site reaction that was seen most frequently in patients, but it was self-limited, patients really did not need any treatment to treat the injection site reaction. Most of the adverse events were Grade 1.

 

This transcript is AI-generated. While we strive for accuracy, please verify this copy with the video.

Read more...

Disclosures

Silence Therapeutics: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Constellation/MorphoSys: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Protagonist Therapeutics: Consultancy; Disc Medicine: Consultancy.