This year I talked about trying to understand relapsed AML using chromatin biology methods. We started with the observation that when you look at paired diagnostic and relapsed samples from the same patient, you often find a significant proportion of patients that don’t have any mutational changes, which begs the question of well then if they’re not having difference in mutations, why are they relapsing? Why are they becoming chemo-resistant? So we used epigenetic methods like ATAC-Seq to try to characterize some of these cases and really just to explore what are the evolutionary paths that cells can take from diagnosis into relapse...
This year I talked about trying to understand relapsed AML using chromatin biology methods. We started with the observation that when you look at paired diagnostic and relapsed samples from the same patient, you often find a significant proportion of patients that don’t have any mutational changes, which begs the question of well then if they’re not having difference in mutations, why are they relapsing? Why are they becoming chemo-resistant? So we used epigenetic methods like ATAC-Seq to try to characterize some of these cases and really just to explore what are the evolutionary paths that cells can take from diagnosis into relapse. And we found that there is epigenetic evolution in these cases where the mutations aren’t changing and that there can be selection of a subset of cells present at diagnosis that have the epigenetic features of relapse. But there can also be convergence of other cells into a relapsed state. So there seems to be multiple evolutionary processes going on that drive AML relapse, in this case post-chemotherapy.